BlogFirms

Blog

Practical guides for IB and PE interviews. No fluff — just the frameworks and answers you need.

Private Equity8 min readSep 23, 2026

The Disclosure Letter Explained: How a Seller Qualifies Every Warranty in the SPA, and Why the Buyer’s Own Diligence Becomes the Seller’s Defence

The warranty schedule in a share purchase agreement looks like buyer protection. The disclosure letter decides how much of it survives — and under English practice, general disclosure of the data room turns the buyer’s own diligence into a defence for the seller.

Read article
Private Equity8 min readAug 26, 2026

Venture Debt Explained: Why It Is Priced Like a Loan but Underwritten Like Equity, and Why the Warrant — Not the Coupon — Is Where the Lender Actually Gets Paid

Venture debt is a loan to a company that has no profits to service it and no assets to secure it — so the lender does not underwrite the cash flow or the collateral. It underwrites the equity syndicate behind the company and the runway to the next round. That reframes everything about how it is priced. The headline coupon of 8-15% is not the cost; it barely covers the losses on the deals that fail. The real return lives in the warrant — 5-20% coverage on the loan amount — which turns a low-teens coupon into a high-teens blended return when the company doubles. And the real risk is a covenant that does nothing for three years and then accelerates the loan the moment the next equity round fails to arrive. Cheap money, right up until it is the most expensive money on the cap table.

Read
Private Equity8 min readAug 26, 2026

The Margin Ratchet Explained: How a Leveraged Loan’s Coupon Steps Down as the LBO Deleverages, and Why It Quietly Compounds the Sponsor’s Return

The margin on a leveraged loan is not fixed for the life of the deal. It sits on a pricing grid — a schedule that cuts the margin by roughly 25bps every time net leverage falls through a defined threshold, and raises it if leverage climbs back up. Because an LBO is engineered to deleverage, the ratchet almost always travels one way: down. That makes it a compounding tailwind hiding in the credit agreement — as the cash sweep pays down debt, leverage falls, the margin ratchets down, the interest bill shrinks faster, and there is more cash to sweep next quarter. And despite the shared word, it has nothing to do with a management ratchet, which sits on the opposite side of the cap table.

Read
Private Equity9 min readAug 25, 2026

Debt Sculpting and the DSCR: Why Infrastructure Debt Is Sized to a Coverage Ratio and Shaped to the Cash-Flow Curve Rather Than Amortised Flat — the Mechanism That Lets a Contracted Asset Carry 85% Debt When a Corporate Buyout Stops at 55%

A corporate buyout sizes its debt as a multiple of EBITDA and pays it down on a fixed schedule. Infrastructure and project finance do neither. The debt is sized to a coverage ratio — the debt-service coverage ratio, or DSCR — and the repayments are sculpted: each period’s principal is set so that total debt service equals the period’s available cash flow divided by a target DSCR, shaping the amortisation to the cash-flow curve instead of a flat line. The consequence is the defining feature of the asset class. Because the cash flow is contracted or regulated and barely moves, a thin coverage cushion is safe, and the same asset that a corporate lender would gear to 55% can be levered to 85–90% of its cost. This is how a toll road, a solar farm or an availability-payment hospital carries a debt load that would break an LBO — and why the one ratio that sizes the debt is also the covenant that polices it.

Read
Private Equity9 min readAug 24, 2026

The Revolving Credit Facility in an LBO: Why a Buyout Raises a Revolver It Never Intends to Draw — the Commitment Fee It Pays for an Empty Line, the Super-Senior Ranking That Puts It First in a Default, and the Springing Covenant It Quietly Carries

Almost every LBO is closed with a revolving credit facility sitting undrawn at zero, and the sponsor pays a fee for the privilege of leaving it that way. The revolver is not there to fund the purchase — the term loans do that. It is a committed, reusable line, usually sized at half a turn to a full turn of EBITDA, that the business draws to cover working-capital swings and seasonal cash troughs and repays when cash comes back. It is left undrawn at close for a precise reason: drawing it adds debt and cash in equal measure, so net leverage barely moves, but the business then pays the full drawn margin on cash it is only sitting on. Cheaper to hold the line as a backstop and pay a commitment fee — typically around 35% of the drawn margin — on the empty commitment. Underneath that quiet line sit two features that decide real outcomes: it ranks super-senior, so it is last to fund and first to be repaid when a structure breaks, and in a covenant-lite deal it carries the only maintenance covenant in the whole package, tested only when the revolver is drawn past a threshold. Here is how the facility is sized, priced, ranked and modelled, and why the line nobody draws is the one that governs the deal when the cycle turns.

Read
Private Equity9 min readAug 22, 2026

How Much Debt Can an LBO Support? Why the Cash-Flow Coverage Test, Not the Headline Leverage Multiple, Sets the Real Ceiling — and Why Higher Rates Cut Buyout Leverage Even Though Lenders’ Appetite Barely Moved

The amount of debt an LBO can raise is not set by a single leverage multiple. It is capped by the lower of two constraints: how much lenders will advance against EBITDA (the leverage test), and how much cash flow the business can spare to service that debt (the coverage test). In a low-rate market the leverage cap binds and sponsors push total debt to the headline multiple lenders quote. When rates rise, the coverage cap binds first — the same debt costs far more to service, so the business runs out of interest cover long before it runs out of borrowing appetite. That is why total leverage on new buyouts fell from roughly 6.5–7.0x EBITDA in 2021 to around 5.0–5.5x by 2023–24 even though the multiples lenders were willing to quote barely moved. Here is how each constraint is measured, why coverage is the one that actually decides the number, how cash-flow quality shifts the ceiling business-by-business, and why the maximum debt a deal can carry is rarely the amount a sponsor should raise.

Read
Private Equity9 min readAug 21, 2026

The Net Working Capital Adjustment Explained: How the Peg Moves the Final Price Pound-for-Pound, Where the Target Is Set, and Why the Estimate Is the Number Both Sides Fight Over

A completion-accounts deal is priced on a cash-free, debt-free basis, which quietly assumes the seller hands over the business with a normal level of working capital to keep it running. The net working capital adjustment enforces that assumption: it compares the working capital actually delivered at completion against a pre-agreed target — the "peg" — and moves the price pound-for-pound for the difference. Deliver £3M less than the peg and the seller receives £3M less; deliver £3M more and the price rises by the same amount. The mechanic sounds like plumbing, but it is where a headline enterprise value quietly turns into a different equity cheque, and the peg itself is one of the most heavily negotiated numbers in the whole sale agreement. Here is what counts as working capital, how the target is set, how each side games the completion number, and why the estimate-then-true-up structure is the single most common source of post-closing disputes.

Read
Private Equity12 min readJun 16, 2026

Liability Management Exercises Explained: Drop-Downs, Uptiers, and the Creditor-on-Creditor Violence That Rewrote Distressed Debt

The intercreditor agreement assumes the perimeter holds: that the collateral stays inside the credit group and that your rank is fixed the day you sign. A liability management exercise is the sponsor proving neither assumption is safe. Using the flexibility buried in cov-lite documents, a borrower and a majority of its lenders can move the best assets out of reach, or manufacture super-priority for themselves and push the minority down — all without a courtroom and without the dissenters' consent. Here is how drop-downs and uptiers actually work, why the term "creditor-on-creditor violence" stuck, and how the 2024 rulings started to close the gaps.

Read
Technical10 min readJul 2, 2026

Conditions Precedent Explained: What Has to Happen Between Signing and Closing — the Antitrust Clearance a Regulator Controls, the MAC Clause Almost No Buyer Can Invoke, and the Long-Stop Date That Ends the Gap

Signing an SPA is a promise; closing is the payment — and months of risk sit in between. The deal is not done until a list of conditions precedent clears: antitrust clearance a regulator controls, third-party consents, sometimes a shareholder vote. In that gap the business is frozen by covenants, the buyer's only exit is a MAC clause that a Delaware court has upheld exactly once, and a long-stop date sets the clock. Here is what fills the gap, what kills deals inside it, and why the answer to 'what can stop a signed deal?' is almost never the MAC.

Read
Technical10 min readJul 3, 2026

The LBO Cash Sweep Explained: How a Buyout Actually Pays Down Its Own Debt — Mandatory Amortisation, the Excess-Cash-Flow Sweep, the Revolver Plug, and the Circular Reference Every Model Breaks On

An LBO makes money three ways, and one of them — debt paydown — happens automatically inside a single tab of the model: the debt schedule. Free cash flow lands, mandatory amortisation is paid first, an excess-cash-flow sweep prepays more, the revolver plugs any shortfall, and the whole thing feeds interest on an average balance that depends on the answer — the circular reference that breaks the model in half the modelling tests handed out. Here is how the schedule actually works, line by line, and why the delevering it produces is a quieter contributor to returns than most candidates think.

Read
Private Equity11 min readJul 5, 2026

Growth Equity vs Buyout Private Equity: Why the Return Is Made a Completely Different Way, and Why the Interview Tests a Different Skill — No Leverage, Minority Stakes, and a Thesis That Lives or Dies on Revenue Growth

Buyout PE and growth equity look adjacent on a CV and are structurally different jobs. A buyout makes its return from leverage, deleveraging and multiple expansion on a business it controls; growth equity takes a minority stake, uses almost no debt, and makes its entire return from one thing — the company growing. That single difference changes the model, the metrics, and the interview: no paper LBO, but market sizing, cohort economics and a thesis you have to defend. Here is where the return comes from in each, and what a growth-equity interviewer is actually grading.

Read
Technical9 min readJul 8, 2026

Purchase Price Allocation Explained: Why Goodwill Is a Residual, How the Asset Write-Up Spawns a Deferred Tax Liability, and the Incremental D&A That Quietly Depresses EPS

Ask a candidate how goodwill is created and most reach for a formula. Goodwill is not calculated — it is what is left over. Purchase price allocation spreads the price paid across the target's assets and liabilities at fair value, and the premium no identifiable asset can absorb becomes goodwill. Here is the full allocation worked end to end: the write-up to fair value, why it spawns a deferred tax liability that quietly increases goodwill, the incremental D&A that depresses reported EPS long after the cash has moved, and why goodwill itself waits untouched until an impairment test writes it down.

Read
Private Equity9 min readJul 13, 2026

Call Protection Explained: Why an LBO Loan Reprices at Par in Six Months but a High-Yield Bond Is Locked for Three Years — the Soft Call, the Non-Call Period, and the Make-Whole That Charges You the Coupon You Tried to Escape

The same buyout borrows two ways at once — a term loan and a high-yield bond — and the two debts obey opposite prepayment rules. The loan carries a soft call: a 1% premium for six months, then it is repayable at par and gets repriced whenever the market rallies. The bond is locked. A non-call period keeps the sponsor out for years, and any attempt to redeem inside it triggers a make-whole that discounts every remaining coupon back at the government rate plus 50bps — handing the lender the yield the borrower was trying to escape. Here is why the two instruments diverge, what the make-whole actually costs on a £500M 8% bond, and why the lock is the price of the lower coupon.

Read
Private Equity9 min readJul 14, 2026

Unitranche Explained: One Loan to the Borrower, Two to the Lenders — the Blended Margin That Collapses the Debt Stack, the First-Out/Last-Out Split, and the Agreement Among Lenders the Borrower Never Sees

To the borrower a unitranche is the simplest debt in leveraged finance: one loan, one margin, one lender, one document — the senior and the mezzanine collapsed into a single instrument. To the lenders it is two loans wearing one coat. Behind a private Agreement Among Lenders the borrower never sees, the facility is split into a first-out piece that is paid first and yields little, and a last-out piece that absorbs the first loss and takes most of the spread. Here is how the blend is built, why a sponsor pays over a Term Loan B for it, and what the split does the day the credit goes wrong.

Read
Private Equity10 min readJul 17, 2026

Commitment Letters and “Certain Funds” Explained: How a Sponsor Proves the Money Is There Before a Pound of Debt Is Drawn — the Equity Commitment Letter, the Debt Papers, the Interim Facilities Agreement, and Why a Well-Advised Seller Never Lets Closing Depend on the Financing

A sponsor signs the SPA weeks before the loan agreement is finalised and months before a pound of debt is drawn — yet the seller needs certainty the money will be there on completion day. That certainty is manufactured before signing, in two letters and a standard almost no candidate can name: the equity commitment letter, the debt commitment papers, and the “certain funds” drafting that strips nearly every condition out of the financing. Here is how the money is committed before it exists, why the seller refuses a financing condition, and what the reverse termination fee is actually pricing.

Read
Private Equity11 min readJul 18, 2026

Preferred and Structured Equity Explained: The Layer Between the Debt and the Common That Fills the Gap When Lenders Won’t Fund It — the Coupon That Compounds, the Liquidation Preference That Comes Off the Top, and Why It Rescues the Sponsor’s IRR in the Upside and Eats the Common in the Downside

When the debt markets will only fund four turns and the seller wants six, a sponsor has two bad options and one that most students have never heard of: a tranche that sits above the common equity but below the debt, carries a coupon near 14% that compounds instead of paying cash, and comes off the top of the exit waterfall before the common sees a penny. Preferred and structured equity is the layer that fills the gap when lenders won’t — and the reason a mediocre exit can hand the sponsor a loss while the preferred holder still makes 1.8x. Here is how it works, why its use has climbed since rates rose, and the asymmetry that decides who gets paid.

Read
Private Equity11 min readJul 19, 2026

The Material Adverse Change Clause Explained: The Escape Hatch a Buyer Almost Never Gets to Use — the “Durationally Significant” Standard Delaware Measures in Years, the Carve-Outs That Decide Everything, and Why Reaching for the MAC Is Usually the Weaker Argument

Every candidate names the MAC clause as the buyer’s way out of a deal that has gone wrong. Almost none can tell you that in the entire history of Delaware M&A litigation a buyer has won on a standalone material adverse change exactly once — and that when a buyer did escape a COVID-era hotels deal, the court found no MAC at all and let it walk on a different clause entirely. Here is what the standard actually demands, why the carve-outs are the whole negotiation, and why the smart money treats the MAC as the argument of last resort rather than the escape hatch it looks like on paper.

Read
Technical10 min readJul 20, 2026

Bridge Financing Explained: The Underwritten Loan Designed So It Never Has to Be Drawn — the Coupon That Ratchets Up Every Quarter to Force a Refinancing, the Fees the Bank Earns Whether or Not a Pound Moves, and Why a Drawn Bridge Is a Disaster for the Lender and Almost No One Else

A bridge loan is the strangest instrument in leveraged finance: an underwritten commitment that banks price, paper, and fee up in full — and then design, deliberately, so that it is never actually lent. Its coupon ratchets higher every quarter towards a cap set to be uneconomic, precisely so the borrower refinances it the moment the bond market opens. Every candidate can name high-yield bonds and term loans; almost none can explain the instrument that guarantees the buyer has the money on day one while those are still being marketed. Here is what the bridge bridges, why the bank collects its fee whether or not a pound moves, and why the rare occasion the bridge is actually drawn is a catastrophe for the lender and for almost no one else.

Read
Technical10 min readJul 21, 2026

Convertible Bonds Explained: Why a Company Borrows at a 2% Coupon by Selling Bondholders an Equity Call Option — the Conversion Premium Set 30% Above Today’s Share Price, the Bond Floor That Makes It Debt Below Conversion and Equity Above It, the Arbitrage Funds That Actually Set the Price, and the Capped Call That Buys the Dilution Back

A convertible bond is the one instrument that is deliberately two things at once: a bond that pays a coupon far below what its issuer would pay on straight debt, and an equity call option the bondholder gets in exchange for accepting that lower coupon. The trade at its heart is simple and widely misread — the cheap coupon is not free money, it is the price of the optionality the issuer has written. Every candidate can define debt and equity; almost none can explain the hybrid that sits between them, why a growth company pays 2% instead of 8%, why hedge funds rather than income investors set its price, and why a record $167bn of convertibles came to market in 2025. Here is what a convert actually is, why companies issue it, and where the catch is hidden.

Read
Private Equity10 min readJul 22, 2026

The LBO Value Creation Bridge Explained: How a Buyout Turns £400m of Equity Into £1,350m — the Three Drivers (EBITDA Growth, Multiple Expansion, Deleveraging), Why Two of Them Are Borrowed and Only One Is Earned, and Why the Return Driver That Built the Industry Is the One That Has Died

Ask a candidate what drives returns in a leveraged buyout and most say “leverage.” The honest answer is three drivers — EBITDA growth, multiple expansion, and debt paydown — and only one of them is a skill. Here is the value creation bridge that decomposes a buyout’s return into its parts, a worked deal where £400m of equity becomes £1,350m, why two of the three drivers are borrowed rather than earned, and why the driver that built the industry — buying cheap and selling dear — is the one the current market has taken away.

Read
Private Equity10 min readJul 23, 2026

How a Private Equity Fund Is Actually Structured: The Limited Partnership, the Ten-Year Life, the Investment Period, and the LPA Terms That Govern the Money Long Before Any Carry Is Paid

A private equity fund is not a company and not a pool of cash — it is a limited partnership, a legal container that separates the passive investors who put up the money from the general partner that runs it, and it holds commitments rather than capital until the moment the GP calls the money in. Every candidate can recite “two and twenty”; almost none can explain what the fund actually is, why the money arrives in drawdowns over five years rather than upfront, why the GP puts its own money in alongside the LPs, and which clauses in the limited partnership agreement decide who controls the fund when things go wrong. Here is the anatomy of a fund — the partnership, the ten-year clock, and the terms that govern the money.

Read
Private Equity10 min readJul 24, 2026

The Dual-Track Process: Why a Private Equity Seller Runs an IPO and a Trade Sale at Once — and Why the Listing Is Usually the Bluff, Not the Plan

A dual-track process is a company being sold two ways at the same time: a full IPO and a private M&A auction, run in parallel, with the owners keeping both doors open until the last responsible moment. It reads like indecision and is the opposite — it is a leverage play. The IPO is rarely the real destination; it is a credible, expensive threat that forces trade buyers to bid against a public-market alternative they cannot see the price of. Most dual-tracks end in a sale, and the listing that never happens still earns its cost. Here is what the two tracks actually are, why they value the same business differently, and why the IPO is usually the bluff rather than the plan.

Read
Technical9 min readJul 27, 2026

"Walk Me Through a DCF": The Six-Step Answer, and the Two Inputs That Actually Decide the Number

A DCF values a company as the present value of the cash it will generate: project unlevered free cash flow for five years, discount each year back at WACC, add a terminal value for everything after year five, discount that back too, sum the two to get enterprise value, then bridge to equity value. That six-step recital is the easy part — every prepared candidate can say it. The separation happens one layer down. In a typical DCF the terminal value is 65–80% of the total, which means the answer is decided almost entirely by two assumptions — the discount rate and the terminal-value method — while the five-year forecast everyone slaves over barely moves the needle. Knowing that, and saying it, is what tells an interviewer you have built one rather than memorised one.

Read
Technical9 min readJul 28, 2026

Cash-Free, Debt-Free Explained: Why the Buyer Agrees Enterprise Value but Writes a Smaller Cheque — the Net-Debt Deduction, the Working-Capital Peg, and the True-Up That Moves the Price Pound-for-Pound

A deal is announced at "£500m enterprise value" and the cheque that clears is £375m. That gap is not a discount or a renegotiation — it is the cash-free, debt-free convention doing exactly what it is designed to do. CFDF means the buyer buys the operating business as if it carried no cash and no borrowings: the seller sweeps out surplus cash and repays existing debt from the proceeds, so the price actually paid is enterprise value minus net debt, then adjusted pound-for-pound for the working capital delivered against a normalised target. The convention is referenced in every process letter and priced into every LBO, and the two adjustments it triggers — net debt and the working-capital peg — are where a headline number quietly turns into a real one.

Read
Private Equity9 min readJul 29, 2026

What Makes a Good LBO Candidate? The Screen a Sponsor Runs Before the Model — Cash-Flow Predictability, Leverage Capacity, a Multiple With Somewhere to Go, and the Management Team You Cannot Model

Ask a private equity investor what makes a good LBO candidate and you will not hear "a low entry multiple" first — you will hear "predictable cash flow." A leveraged buyout is a structure that borrows against a company's future cash to buy it today, so the first screen is not whether the business is cheap or growing fast but whether its cash flow is reliable enough to service debt through a downturn without the equity being wiped out. Everything else — leverage capacity, margin resilience, a multiple with room to expand, a fragmented market to consolidate, a management team worth backing — sits on top of that foundation. The LBO model quantifies the returns; the screen decides whether the assumptions feeding it are safe to make. Get the order right and the "would you buy this company?" interview answers itself.

Read
Technical10 min readJul 30, 2026

Football Field Valuation Explained: How the Chart That Sits on the Front of Every Pitch Book Triangulates a Price From Five Methodologies

A football field valuation is the horizontal bar chart on the front of every pitch book and fairness opinion: one bar per methodology — trading comps, precedent transactions, DCF, LBO, the 52-week trading range — laid on a shared value axis so the eye finds the zone where they overlap. It exists because valuation does not produce a number, it produces a range, and the defensible answer to "what is this worth?" is where the independent methods agree rather than any one of them alone. The bars land in a predictable order for structural reasons — precedents at the top because they carry a control premium, DCF widest because it turns on assumptions, LBO at the floor because it is the most a financial sponsor could pay and still hit its return — and reading that order correctly is the difference between presenting a chart and understanding it.

Read
Technical10 min readJul 31, 2026

Merger Arbitrage Explained: Why an Announced Target Trades Below the Offer Price — the Deal Spread, the Completion Probability It Implies, and the Pennies-Up, Pounds-Down Payoff That Punishes a Single Break

When a cash bid is announced the target re-rates almost to the offer price but stops just short — and that gap is not a market error, it is the merger-arbitrage spread. It is the price the market puts on the risk that a signed, announced deal still fails to close: antitrust blocks it, the financing falls away, shareholders vote it down, a buyer reaches for a material-adverse-change clause. Read the spread backwards and it hands you the market's implied probability of completion; a £0.80 gap on a £25 all-cash offer is the market pricing a roughly 89% chance the deal closes. The catch is the shape of the bet — a few percent of upside if it completes, a fall most of the way back to the unaffected price if it breaks — pennies up, pounds down, which is why the whole discipline is estimating completion odds better than the tape and sizing for the break you cannot see.

Read
Technical9 min readAug 1, 2026

The Fairness Opinion Explained: What a Bank Actually Opines On, Why It Protects the Board Rather Than the Shareholder, and Where the Conflict Sits Inside the Fee It Is Paid

A fairness opinion is a single sentence: in the bank's opinion, the consideration is fair, from a financial point of view, to the target's shareholders. It is not a valuation, not a recommendation to sell, and not a view on whether a higher price was achievable — and understanding what it deliberately does not say is the whole point. It exists because a Delaware court in 1985 held a board liable for approving a deal without one, so the opinion is really a process document that protects directors from a duty-of-care claim. The awkward part is who writes it: usually the same bank running the sale on a success fee that only pays if the deal closes, which is exactly the conflict that cost RBC $76M in the Rural/Metro case. The UK solves the same problem differently, through the Takeover Code's Rule 3 adviser.

Read
Technical9 min readAug 13, 2026

Leveraged Loans vs High-Yield Bonds: Rate, Ranking, Covenants and Call Protection

A leveraged loan is senior secured, floating-rate and prepayable at par; a high-yield bond is usually unsecured, fixed-rate and locked shut by a non-call period. That single contrast — flexibility for the lender versus certainty for the borrower — drives every other difference between the two instruments a sponsor uses to fund a buyout. First-lien loans have recovered roughly 66 cents on the dollar against 39 for senior unsecured bonds, yet 93% of new institutional loans now come cov-lite, so the security the loan market prices for and the control it once carried have quietly parted ways. This piece walks the five dimensions that separate the two, why the borrower picks one over the other, and how the question is used to test whether a candidate understands a capital structure or just its labels.

Read
Technical9 min readAug 13, 2026

Premiums Paid Analysis Explained: Why the Reference Date Decides the Answer, What a Leak Does to the Denominator, and Why It Is Not a Valuation

A premiums paid analysis looks like a valuation cross-check and behaves like a negotiating instrument. The mechanic is simple - compare the offer to the target's share price before announcement - but the choice of which day counts as "before" moves the answer more than the deal does. UK public M&A in 2025 produced an average bid premium near 46% measured against the price before the offer period and roughly 12% on a 30-day basis: the same transactions, a different denominator. Here is how the analysis is built, why a leak quietly transfers the premium into the price it is measured against, and what it can honestly be used to argue.

Read
Technical9 min readAug 14, 2026

Term Loan A vs Term Loan B: Who Holds It, How It Amortises, and Why the Pricing and Covenants Diverge

A Term Loan A and a Term Loan B are the same senior secured debt cut into two tranches by who holds it. The TLA sits with relationship banks alongside the revolver — the "pro rata" package — amortises heavily over roughly five years, and prices inside the TLB. The TLB is sold to institutional investors, chiefly CLOs and loan funds, repays a token 1% a year and bullets the rest at around seven years, prices wider, and is now almost always cov-lite. Everything a candidate is asked about the two — amortisation, pricing, covenants, call protection — falls out of that single split in the lender base. Here is how each is built, why a sponsor funding a buyout reaches for the TLB, and how the distinction is used to test whether someone understands a leveraged loan or just its label.

Read
Technical9 min readAug 15, 2026

Second Lien vs Mezzanine: Why One Is a Secured Cash-Pay Loan and the Other Is Unsecured, PIK-Heavy Debt That Comes With Warrants

Both a second lien and a mezzanine tranche sit below the senior debt and above the equity in a buyout — which is why students merge them. They are not the same instrument. A second lien is a secured loan: it holds a junior lien on the same collateral as the first lien, ranks behind it by an intercreditor agreement, pays a floating cash coupon and trades among institutional credit investors. Mezzanine is unsecured subordinated debt: it ranks behind the secured lenders by contract, carries a high fixed coupon split between cash and PIK, comes with warrants to reach an equity-like return, and is held to maturity by a private fund. The whole comparison — pricing, subordination, recovery, who holds it — falls out of that one fact: the second lien is secured, the mezzanine is not. Here is how each is built, where each fits in the stack, and why private-credit unitranche has swallowed most of the ground both used to occupy.

Read
Private Equity9 min readAug 16, 2026

Equity Cure Rights Explained: How a Sponsor Cures a Covenant Breach, Why an EBITDA Cure Costs Six Times Less Than Paying Down Debt, and the Caps That Stop It Becoming an Evergreen Crutch

An equity cure is the release valve in a leveraged loan: the sponsor injects fresh equity that the credit agreement treats, for the covenant test only, as extra EBITDA or as debt repaid, converting what would be an event of default into a capital call on the fund. The mechanic is worth understanding precisely because the two versions cost wildly different amounts of money. Cure the same breach by deeming EBITDA rather than paying down debt and the cheque is smaller by exactly the leverage multiple — at 6.0x net leverage, a £5M EBITDA cure does the work of a £30M debt paydown. Here is how the cure is built, why lenders cap how often it can be used, and why fixing the ratio is not the same as fixing the business.

Read
Private Equity9 min readAug 18, 2026

The Delayed-Draw Term Loan: Committed Debt a Sponsor Draws Later — the Availability Period, the Ticking Fee, and Why It Funds a Buy-and-Build

A delayed-draw term loan is a term loan the lender agrees to in full at close but the borrower takes down later, in one or more tranches, across a defined window. The commitment is firm — the lender is bound to fund each draw when it is called — but the cash waits off the balance sheet until a specific use, almost always an acquisition, triggers it. That certainty is not free: the borrower pays a ticking fee on the undrawn commitment, typically stepping up from a fraction of the margin to the full margin as the window runs. It is the financing built for the buy-and-build — committed where the accordion is not, and term debt where the revolver is not. Here is how the instrument works, the ticking fee in cash, and why a sponsor running a bolt-on pipeline reaches for it.

Read
Private Equity9 min readAug 19, 2026

The Continuation Fund: How a GP Sells an Asset to a Vehicle It Also Manages — and Why It Now Sits on Both Sides of Every Trophy-Asset Exit

A continuation fund is a new vehicle a private equity manager sets up to buy a company out of one of its own ageing funds, funded by fresh secondary investors, so it can hold the asset for another three-to-five years past the old fund’s clock. Existing investors are given a choice: cash out at the deal price, or roll their stake into the new vehicle. The structure has moved from a home for troubled assets to the default exit route for a fund’s best company — GP-led secondaries ran to roughly $70bn in 2024, about half the record secondary market — and it carries a conflict no other exit does: the same GP represents the seller and the buyer, and sets the price on both sides. Here is how the transaction works, the three choices an existing LP faces, and how to read whether a given deal was struck at a fair one.

Read
Technical9 min readAug 23, 2026

Asset Deal vs Share Deal: Why the Buyer Wants One, the Seller Wants the Other, and Why UK Tax Usually Settles It

In an asset deal the buyer purchases specific assets and only the liabilities it agrees to take; in a share deal it buys the company whole, warts and all. The buyer prefers assets — it gets a stepped-up tax base to depreciate and leaves the target's history behind. The seller prefers shares — a clean exit, a single tax charge, and in the UK often no tax at all. In UK private M&A the seller's tax position usually wins, which is why the overwhelming majority of deals complete as share purchases and the buyer recovers its economics through leverage rather than a step-up. Here is what actually transfers in each, why the tax asymmetry decides it, and the situations that flip it back to assets.

Read