EBITDA to Free Cash Flow: The Bridge, the Tax Trap, and the Lease Accounting Wrinkle
7 min read
- FCF = EBITDA - Interest - Taxes +/- Working Capital Changes - Capex. The bridge has five steps and each one is testable.
- You cannot calculate taxes by multiplying EBITDA by the tax rate. You must first deduct D&A and interest to get pre-tax income, then apply the tax rate.
- The bridge produces levered FCF (cash to equity). For unlevered FCF, exclude interest and use taxes on EBIT instead.
- Under IFRS 16, lease payments are split between interest and principal. Both must be deducted to get a true FCF figure.
The Bridge: Five Steps From EBITDA to FCF
Step by step:
The Tax Trap: Why EBITDA × (1 - Tax Rate) Is Wrong
This is the single most common error in EBITDA-to-FCF conversions and it comes up regularly in interviews.
| Approach | Calculation | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Wrong: tax on EBITDA | £100M EBITDA × 25% = £25M tax | Overstates tax by ignoring deductible expenses |
| Right: tax on pre-tax income | Pre-tax income = £100M - £15M D&A - £10M interest = £75M. Tax = £75M × 25% = £18.75M | Correct: D&A and interest are tax-deductible |
The difference (£6.25M in this example) is the combined tax shield from depreciation and interest. A candidate who calculates taxes on EBITDA directly will understate FCF by the entire tax shield amount.
Levered vs Unlevered: Two Versions of the Bridge
| Step | Levered FCF (FCFE) | Unlevered FCF (FCFF) |
|---|---|---|
| Start | EBITDA | EBITDA |
| Interest | Subtract net interest | Do not subtract (captured in WACC) |
| Taxes | On pre-tax income (EBITDA - D&A - Interest) | On EBIT (EBITDA - D&A), ignoring interest deduction |
| D&A | Already excluded from EBITDA (no action) | Already excluded from EBITDA (no action) |
| Working capital | Adjust | Adjust |
| Capex | Subtract | Subtract |
| Debt flows | Add issuance, subtract repayment | Exclude |
| Result | Cash to equity holders | Cash to all investors |
| Discount rate | Cost of equity | WACC |
The unlevered version is used in DCF valuations (produces enterprise value). The levered version is used in LBO models and equity analysis (produces equity value). For a deeper treatment of unlevered FCF specifically, see Unlevered Free Cash Flow: The Formula, What to Include, and the SBC Debate.
The Lease Accounting Wrinkle
Lease accounting standards (IFRS 16 and ASC 842) changed how leases flow through the financial statements, and this directly affects the EBITDA-to-FCF bridge.
Under IFRS 16: All leases are capitalised. The lease payment is split into an interest component (in interest expense) and a principal repayment component (in financing cash flows). EBITDA no longer includes the lease expense at all, which means EBITDA is higher, but you must separately deduct both the lease interest and the lease principal to get true FCF.
Under US GAAP (ASC 842): Operating leases are still expensed through EBITDA (the operating lease expense reduces operating income). Only finance leases are split into interest and principal. So for US GAAP companies with mostly operating leases, EBITDA already captures the lease cost.
Worked Example
| Item | Amount (£M) |
|---|---|
| EBITDA | 100.0 |
| D&A | (15.0) |
| Net interest expense | (10.0) |
| Pre-tax income | 75.0 |
| Cash taxes at 25% | (18.8) |
| After-tax income | 56.3 |
| Add back D&A (non-cash) | 15.0 |
| Working capital increase | (5.0) |
| Capex | (20.0) |
| Levered Free Cash Flow | 46.3 |
FCF conversion: £46.3M / £100M EBITDA = 46.3%. This means 46 pence of every pound of EBITDA converts to actual cash. For context, asset-light businesses (SaaS, professional services) typically convert at 50-70%. Capital-intensive businesses (manufacturing, telecoms) convert at 20-40%.
Interview Questions
"Walk me through EBITDA to free cash flow."
Start with EBITDA. Subtract net interest expense. Calculate taxes on pre-tax income (EBITDA minus D&A minus interest, times the tax rate), not on EBITDA itself. Adjust for working capital changes: increases in receivables and inventory are cash outflows, increases in payables are inflows. Subtract capex. The result is levered free cash flow, which represents cash available to equity holders after all operating costs, interest, taxes, and reinvestment.
"Why is EBITDA not a good proxy for cash flow?"
Because it ignores four significant cash items: taxes, interest, working capital requirements, and capital expenditure. A company with £100M of EBITDA might generate only £30-50M of actual free cash flow after these deductions. EBITDA is useful as a quick operating profitability measure and for calculating EV/EBITDA multiples, but it should never be confused with cash available to investors.
"A company has high EBITDA margins but poor FCF conversion. What could explain this?"
High capex intensity (the business requires heavy reinvestment to maintain its asset base). Large working capital requirements (long receivable collection cycles or high inventory levels). High interest burden from heavy leverage. Or significant lease obligations under IFRS 16 that are excluded from EBITDA but represent real cash outflows. Any of these can produce a wide gap between EBITDA and FCF.
Take Your Preparation Further
Download our free Financial Ratios Cheat Sheet for FCF conversion ratios, capital intensity metrics, and cash quality analysis. For the complete valuation framework including DCF methodology, see the Valuation Cheat Sheet.
Ready for personalised feedback? Book a 1-on-1 mentoring session with an experienced IB/PE professional.